Rubric


 * || **Advanced Proficient**
 * A+-A-**
 * 50-46** || **Meets Expectations**
 * B+-B-**
 * 45-41** || **Attempted**
 * C+-C-**
 * 40-36** || **Doesn’t Meet Expectations**
 * D+-D-**
 * 35-0** ||  ||
 * **Design /Structure** || Layout is clear (use of headings, subheadings, links, bolding, underlining, etc) and information is well organized and easy to read/scan. || Layout is mostly clear and information is mostly easy to read/scan. || Layout and information are mostly clear and easy to read/scan. || Layout and information are unclear and difficult to read/scan. ||  ||
 * || Excellent selection and use of helpful supplemental resources (links, photos, video, images, etc.) || Adequate selection and use of appropriate supplemental resources. || Some selection and use of adequate supplemental resources. || No selection, possible improper use of supplemental resources, which may be irrelevant. ||  ||
 * **Knowledge** || Research is well developed and executed. All information is factual and accurate. || Research is adequately developed, executed, and accurate though may lack is depth and scope || Research is poorly developed and executed. May include inaccuracies. || Research is mostly inaccurate or may be feeble and inadequately cover the subject. ||  ||
 * ^  || Demonstrates in-depth understanding and analysis of the research and novel’s symbols and themes. || Demonstrates mostly accurate understanding of the research and novel’s symbols and themes though analysis may lack depth. || Demonstrates broad, cursory, or superficial understanding of the research and how it relates to novel’s symbols and themes. || Analysis marred by considerable inaccuracies; merely summarizes. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Connections are innovative, varied, and artfully articulated. They help develop understanding, perspective, or reaction to the novel. || Connections are present and artfully articulated. They help clarify understanding, perspective, or reaction to the novel. || Connections are weak and their choice/role is poorly articulated; do not help extend learning. || Connections are inappropriate or missing and their choice/role is not articulated; detract from learning. ||^   ||
 * **Mechanics** || All material is correctly and appropriately cited and credited.

All content is proof read and edited. No errors. || All material is appropriately cited/credited with infrequent errors.

Most content is proof read and edited. Few to no errors. || Most material is appropriately cited and credited.

Content is proof read and edited but with some errors. || Material is inappropriately cited and credited.

Content not proof read and edited, with frequent errors. ||  || Demonstrated leadership, collaboration and teamwork. || Frequently made many useful contributions to large and small groups. Showed consistent evidence of leadership or teamwork. || Irregularly made contributions. Effort in project lacking. Showed little evidence of leadership or teamwork. || Inappropriate or no contributions. Effort in project lacking. No evidence of leadership or teamwork. ||^  ||
 * **Process** || Met all deadlines and used time well. || Met all deadlines but used time inconsistently. || Met most deadlines but inconsistently used time. || Missed most deadlines. Off task and a distraction. ||  ||
 * ^  || Demonstrates authentic and in-depth reflection regularly and frequently. || Demonstrates authentic reflection regularly that may lack in depth. || Reflections regularly but may be superficial or cursory. || Reflections are completed irregularly or not at all and are superficial or cursory. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Consistently made significant and constructive contributions (in terms of ideas and management or wiki pages and discussion) to small and large groups.

200 Point Potential--->Total Earned: